Radioisotopes Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Radioisotopes, including details on radioimmunotherapy, radionuclides, procedures, hazards.

Observer reproducibility and validity of systems for clinical classification of angina pectoris: comparison with radionuclide imaging and coronary angiography.

Christensen HW, Haghfelt T, Vach W, Johansen A, Høilund-Carlsen PF

Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark. h.wulff@nikkb.dk

OBJECTIVE: To assess reproducibility and validity of clinical classification of angina pectoris (AP) patients. DESIGN: Fifty-six patients scheduled for coronary angiography because of stable AP were classified by two independent observers with regard to (i) type and (ii) severity of chest pain (Canadian Cardiovascular Society, CCS) and (iii) cardiac functional status (New York Heart Association, NYHA). Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was performed in 55 including measurement of ejection fraction in 46, angiography was undertaken in 51. RESULTS: Observers agreed 100% on the presence (n = 45) or absence (n = 11) of angina. They agreed in 52 (93%), 48 (86%), and 42 (75%) patients with regard to type of pain, CCS grade, and NYHA class, respectively. In the remaining patients, they disagreed by one class only. The positive and negative predictive values of typical/atypical angina for perfusion abnormalities and coronary disease were 55%/82% and 53%/ 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Observer agreement was excellent for presence, type, and severity of chest pain but moderate with regard NYHA class. Clinical judgment could not predict with reasonable accuracy abnormal perfusion or coronary artery disease.

Published 9 January 2006 in Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 26(1): 26-31.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2005-2008 Radioisotopes Research Today. All Rights Reserved.